Students' Mathematical Argumentation with the Visualizer Cognitive Style in Proving the Congruence of Triangles
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53299/jagomipa.v4i1.453Keywords:
Mathematical Argumentation, Visualizer, Proof, Congruence of TrianglesAbstract
The use of axiomatic deductiveism, perception problems, mathematical visual representations and how students convey arguments as a bridge in proving geometric problems are obstacles that are often faced by students. This research aims to describe how prospective mathematics teacher students who have a visualiser cognitive style convey their mathematical arguments in explaining proofs related to triangle congruence. The subjects of this research were selected from students who have a visualizer cognitive style who had previously been given a cognitive style questionnaire. The research subjects consisted of 3 subjects, each with high (S1), medium (S2) and low (S3) mathematics abilities. Data were analyzed using Toulmin argumentation components. The research results show that S1 provides proof based on correct claims, providing fairly complete data both from the question statement and additional data resulting from the subject's reasoning which is used to decide on the claim. The subject uses several warrants and is supported by logical backing to connect the data with the claim. For S2 and S3 to provide final answers or false claims, they have incomplete data as a basis for deciding claims because the subject is mistaken in representing the image and is deep in mathematical literacy related to errors in describing the visualization in the image.
References
Astuti, M. A. (2019). Profil Berrpikir Kritis Siswa SMP dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika Kontekstual Ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif Visualizer-Verbalizer dan Perbedaan Jenis Kelamin. MATHEdunesa, 8(2), 153–162. DOI:10.26740/mathedunesa.v11n3.p684-698
Akay, H. (2010). The Effect of Problem Posing Oriented Analyses-II Course on the Attitudes toward Mathematical and Mathematics Self-Efficiancy of Elementary Prospective Mathematics Teacher. Australian Journal of Teacher Education Turkey. Vol. 35. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ908190
Asyhar, Beni. (2015). Studi Pemahaman Bukti Dan Pembuktian Dalam Geometri Euclid Mahasiswa Jurusan Tadris Matematika Iain Tulungagung. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 1(2). 127–135. DOI:10.33474/jpm.v1i2.720
Ayu Septyani, D., & Yuli Eko Siswono, T. (2018). Proses Berpikir Kritis Siswa Smp Dalam Pengajuan Masalah Matematika Berdasarkan Gaya Kognitif Visualizer Dan Verbalizer. MATHEdunesa, 7(2), 205–213. https://ejournal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/mathedunesa/article/view/23481
Bestiyana, R. A. (2018). Profil Berpikir Kritis Siswa Smp Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Higher Order Thinking Matematik Ditinjau Dari Gaya Kognitif Visualizer dan Verbalizer. MATHEdunesa, 7(1), 101–108. https://doi.org/10.26740/mathedunesa.v7n1.p%25p
Budiarto, M.P & Rudianto, A. (2019). Geometri Dan Permasalahan Dalam Pembelajarannya (Suatu Penelitian Meta Analisis). Jumadika, Jurnal Magister Pendidikan Matematika, 1(1), 9-18. DOI:10.30598/jumadikavol1iss1year2019page9-18
Casanova, J. R., Cantoria, C. C. C., & Lapinid, M. R. C. (2021). Students’ geometric thinking on triangles: Much improvement is needed. Infinity, 10(2), 217-234. DOI:10.22460/infinity.v10i2.p217-234
Clara, F.I & Dadan, D. (2023). Kemampuan Representasi Matematis Pada Siswa Indonesia Berdasarkan Karakteristik Cara Berpikir: Sistematik Literatur Review. Pasundan Journal of Research in Mathematics Learning and Education, 8(2). Hal 230-242. DOI:10.23969/symmetry.v8i2.11009
Conner et all. (2014). Teacher Support for Collective Argumentation: A Framework for Examining How Teachers Support Students’ Engagement in Mathematical Activities, Educ Stud Math, 8(6), 401-429. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10649-014-9532-8
Dinata, Karsoni. B. (2019). Problematika Membangun Pemahaman Konsep Geometri Transformasi Mahasiswa Pendidikan Matematika Di Universitas Muhammadiyah Kotabumi Tahun Akademik 2019/2020. Jurnal Eksponen, 9(2), 1-9. https://www.neliti.com/publications/338966/problematika-membangun-pemahaman-konsep-geometri-transformasi-mahasiswa-pendidik
Dirgantoro, K. P. S. (2019). Analisis Kesulitan Mahasiswa PGSD pada Mata Kuliah Geometri. JNPM (Jurnal Nasional Pendidikan Matematika), 3(1), DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.33603/jnpm.v3i1.1008
Fauzi, I., & Andika, A. (2020). Analisis Kesulitan Belajar Siswa pada Materi Geometri di Sekolah Dasar. Kreano, 11(1), 27-35. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15294/kreano.v11i1.20726
Ikashaum, F., Juitaning, M., Endah, W., & Edo, D.C. 2021. Analisis Kesalahan Representasi Simbolik Mahasiswa Pada Soal Geometri Analitik Bidang. Al-Khwarizmi: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, 9(1), 57-68. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24256/jpmipa.v9i1.1701
Indahwati, R & Fetty, N. 2022. Student's Ability In Explaining The Concept Of Solid Figure's Volume Reviewed From Visualizer Verbalizer Cognitive Style. Journal of Mathematics Education, 7(1), 36-45. http:// doi.org/10.31327/jme.v7i1.1733
Indahwati, R., Dwi. R.S., Hasan, B. (2024). Exploration of Students' Mathematical Literacy Abilities in Visualizing Division of Fraction. Indomath, 7(1), 35-47. https://indomath.org/index.php/indomath
Juman, Zeinul Abdeen M. Silmi, et al. Difficulties in Learning Geometry Component in Mathematics and Active-Based Learning Methods to Overcome the Difficulties. Shanlax International Journal of Education, 10(2), 41–58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34293/ education.v10i2.4299
Kristina. (2020). Belajar Mudah Metodologi Penenlitian Kualitatif. Jakarta: Rumah Media.
L.B. Tristanti, A. Sutawidjaja, A.R. As' ari, & M. Muskar. (2016). The Construction of Deductive Warrant Derived from Inductive Warrant in Preservice-Teacher Mathematical Argumentations. Educational Research and Reviews, 11(17), 1696-1708. DOI: 10.5897/ERR2016.2872
Lette, Imelda, and Janet Trineke Manoy. (2019). Representasi Siswa SMP Dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika Ditinjau Dari Kemampuan Matematika. MATHEdunesa, 8(3), 69–75. doi: 10.26740/mathedunesa.v8n3.p569-575
Lutfi, Jasmine Salsabila, and Hikmatul Khusna. (2021). Analisis Kemampuan Representasi Matematis Siswa Berdasarkan Tingkat Motivasi Belajar Pada Pandemi Covid-19. Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 5(3), 85–97. doi: 10.31004/cendekia.v5i3.728
Lutfi, Jasmine Salsabila, and Dadan Dasari. (2023). Mathematical Representation Ability in View of Self-Efficacy: Systematic Literature Review. Mathline: Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 8(2), 439–56. DOI:10.31943/mathline.v8i2.400
Mafirah, W.N., Rufiana, I.S., & Wahyudi. 2020. Analisis Kemampuan Representasi Visual Siswa Pada Materi Pengolahan Data Ditinjau Dari Gaya Belajar Vak. Jurnal J-PiMat, 2(2), 175-186. https://jurnal.stkippersada.ac.id/jurnal/index.php/jpimat/article/view/875
McEwan, R., & Reynolds, S. (2007). Verbalisers and Visualisers: Cognitive Styles That Are Less Than Equal. Faculty and Staff Publications - CRI.
Mendelson, A. L. (2004). For Whom is a Picture Worth a Thousand Words? Effects of the Visualizing Cognitive Style and Attention on Processing of News Photos. Journal of Visual Literacy, 24(1), 1-22. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/23796529.2004.11674600
Amiruddin, M.Z.B., Eka,P.D.N.S., Uci, V.P., Suliyanah, Setyo,A. 2023. The Contribution Of Toulmin's Argumentation Patterns In Physics Learning In Indonesia: Literature Review. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Dan IPA, 14(1), 93-106. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26418/jpmipa.v14i1.55338
N. Metaxas, D. Potari, dan T. Zachariades. 2016. Analysis of a teacher’s pedagogical arguments using Toulmin’s model and argumentation schemes. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 9(3), 383-397. DOI:10.1007/S10649-016-9701-Z
Novitasari, D., Ria, S. & Sudiana. 2021. 3Kemampuan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif Visualizer dan Verbalizer Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Matematika. Jurnal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 5(2), 1476-1487. DOI: 10.31004/cendekia.v5i2.662
Pramesti, P. & Abdul, H.R., 2020. Profil Argumentasi Siswa dalam Memecahkan Masalah PISA-like Berdasarkan Model Toulmin. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan dan Inovasi Pembelajaran Matematika, 3(2), 92-101. DOI:10.26740/jrpipm.v3n2.p92-101
Ramdjid, R. N., Sukestiyarno, S., Rochmad, R. & Mulyono, M. (2022). Students’ difficulties in solving geometry problems. Cypriot Journal of Educational Science, 17(12), 4628-4640. https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v17i12.7039
Rezki, A. & Nurfadilah, M. (2018). Analisis Kemampuan Representasi Matematis Dalam Pemecahan Masalah Geometri Serta Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhinya. Jurnal Review Pembelajaran Matematika, 3(2), 146-160 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15642/jrpm.
Rohman, Ajeng Siti, Euis Eti Rohaeti, and M. Afrilianto. (2018). Kemampuan Representasi Matematis Siswa SMP Kelas VIII Pada Materi Sistem Persamaan Linear Dua Variabel Dengan Pendekatan Kontekstual. Sosiohumaniora: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Sosial Dan Humaniora, 4(1):51–62
Salam, R.W. 2020. Profil Penalaran Siswa Mts Dalam Mengajukan Masalah Aljabar Ditinjau Dari Gaya Kognitif Visualiser Dan Verbaliser. EduTeach Jurnal Edukasi dan Teknologi Pembelajaran, 1(2), 54-64. DOI:10.37859/eduteach.v1i2.1950
Setyawati, R. D., Ervia. B.A., Agung, H. 2020. “Profil Kemampuan Representasi Matematis Siswa SMP Ditinjau Dari dari Self Efficacy. Jurnal Phenomenon, 10(2), 220-235, DOI: 10.21580/phen.2020.10.2.6627
Shodikin, A., Tatik, R.M., Siti, F. Dea, W.S. 2023. Students' Analogical Reasoning in Solving Geometry Problems Viewed from Visualizer's and Verbalizer's Cognitive Style, 6(3), 330-338. DOI:10.23887/jp2.v6i3.60960
S. Toulmin. 2003. The Uses of Argument. UK: Cambridge University Press.
Sibel, E. 2018. Toulmin’s argument pattern as a horizon of possibilities in the study of argumentation in science education, Cultural Studies of Science Education, vol. 13, no. 4, 1091-1099. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-017-9847-8
Utami, P. R., I. Junaedi, and I. Hidayah. (2018).Mathematical Representation Ability of Studentsâ€TM Grade X in Mathematics Learning on Problem Based Learning. Unnes
Widodo, W. & Widya, Y.D. (2017). Berpikir kritis siswa ditinjau dari gaya kognitif visualizer dan verbalizer dalam menyelesaikan masalah geometri. Beta Jurnal Tadirs Matematika, 10(2), 117-133 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.20414/betajtm.v10i2.109.
Widhi, M.T.W., Arif. R.H., Nur, I.W., Mohammad, I.S., Setyo, A. (2021). Analisis Keterampilan Argumentasi Ilmiah Peserta Didik Pada Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Toulmin’s Argumentation Pattern (TAP) Dalam Memahami Konsep Fisika Dengan Metode Library Research. PENDIPA Journal of Science Education, 5(1), 79-91. https://ejournal.unib.ac.id/index.php/pendipa
Winer, M. L., & Battista, M. T. (2022). Investigating Students’ Proof Reasoning: Analyzing Students’ Oral Proof Explanations and their Written Proofs in High School Geometry. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 17(2), em0677. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/11713
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 JagoMIPA: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan IPA
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
