Enhancing Mathematical Cognition through Deep Learning Visualization: A Cognitive and Pedagogical Integration
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53299/jppi.v5i4.2812Keywords:
Deep learning visualization, backpropagation, metacognition, self-regulated learning, learning analytics, linear programmingAbstract
This mixed-methods study examines whether backpropagation-based deep learning (DL) visualizations can strengthen metacognition and learning outcomes in a university Linear Programming course. Sixty undergraduates (8-week blended format) completed pre/post cognitive tests and the Metacognitive Awareness Inventory (MAI), while their LMS activity traces (e.g., time-on-task, revision frequency, error types) trained a multilayer perceptron. The intervention exposed students to DL visual artifacts—loss curves, gradient/weight updates, and error heatmaps—as reflective scaffolds linking machine error correction to human self-regulation. Quantitatively, mean test scores increased from 61.23 to 80.57 (paired-t, p < .001), and total MAI rose from 135.40 to 159.85 (paired-t, p < .001). Gains concentrated in regulation of cognition (monitoring/evaluation). Metacognitive improvement correlated with achievement (Pearson r = .62, p < .001). Computationally, model loss decreased from 0.25 to 0.03 over 200 epochs with 89.4% validation accuracy; Dynamic Time Warping = 0.81 (p < .01) indicated strong temporal alignment between DL loss minimization and students’ learning curves. Qualitatively, thematic analysis of weekly reflections and interviews revealed a progression from error recognition to strategy adjustment and reflective transformation, recasting errors as actionable signals. Triangulating quantitative, computational, and qualitative strands supports the Cognitive Backpropagation Learning (CBL) framework: DL error feedback parallels human metacognitive feedback, and its visualization functions as a digital mirror that externalizes reflection. Findings recommend interpretable DL dashboards as practical, class-deployable scaffolds to cultivate reflective, adaptive mathematical thinkers.
References
Alfredo, R., Echeverria, V., Jin, Y., Yan, L., Swiecki, Z., Gašević, D., & Martinez-Maldonado, R. (2024). Human-centred learning analytics and AI in education: A systematic literature review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, 100215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100215
An, P., Holstein, K., d’Anjou, B., Eggen, B., & Bakker, S. (2020). The TA Framework: Designing Real-time Teaching Augmentation for K-12 Classrooms. Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376277
Anthonysamy, L. (2021). The use of metacognitive strategies for undisrupted online learning: Preparing university students in the age of pandemic. Education and Information Technologies, 26(6), 6881–6899. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10518-y
Cogliano, M., Bernacki, M. L., & Kardash, C. M. (2021). A metacognitive retrieval practice intervention to improve undergraduates’ monitoring and control processes and use of performance feedback for classroom learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(7), 1421–1440. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000624
Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and Cognitive Monitoring A New Area of Cognitive-Developmental Inquiry A Model of Cognitive Monitoring.
Gutierrez de Blume, A. P. (2022). Calibrating calibration: A meta-analysis of learning strategy instruction interventions to improve metacognitive monitoring accuracy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 114(4), 681–700. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000674
Hammoda, B. (2025). Extracurricular Activities for Entrepreneurial Learning: A Typology Based on Learning Theories. Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogy, 8(1), 142–173. https://doi.org/10.1177/25151274231218212
Holroyd, C. B., & Coles, M. G. H. (2002). The neural basis of human error processing: Reinforcement learning, dopamine, and the error-related negativity. Psychological Review, 109(4), 679–709. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.109.4.679
Iftanti, E., Zahroh, U., & Musrikah, M. (2021). Correlation Among Semantic, Syntactic, Pragmatic, And Cognitive Barriers Towards Accuracy Geometry Proofs. English Review: Journal of English Education, 10(1), 309–322. https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v10i1.5711
Kumah, M. S. (2023). Latent Class Analysis of Mathematics/Science Students Metacognitive Learning Strategies in College of Education in Volta Region, Ghana. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2917433/v1
Lavi, R., Shwartz, G., & Dori, Y. J. (2019). Metacognition in Chemistry Education: A Literature Review. Israel Journal of Chemistry, 59(6–7), 583–597. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijch.201800087
Luo, Y. (2024). Revolutionizing education with AI: The adaptive cognitive enhancement model (ACEM) for personalized cognitive development. Applied and Computational Engineering, 82(1), 71–76. https://doi.org/10.54254/2755-2721/82/20240929
Mathaba, P. N., & Bayaga, A. (2021). Analysis of Types, Sources of Errors and Misconceptions in South African Algebra Cognition. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 9(5), 928–937. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2021.090505
Nazaretsky, T., Bar, C., Walter, M., & Alexandron, G. (2022). Empowering Teachers with AI: Co-Designing a Learning Analytics Tool for Personalized Instruction in the Science Classroom. LAK22: 12th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3506860.3506861
Ooge, J., Vanneste, A., Szymanski, M., & Verbert, K. (2025). Designing Visual Explanations and Learner Controls to Engage Adolescents in AI-Supported Exercise Selection. Proceedings of the 15th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3706468.3706470
Pacheco, A. J., Boude Figueredo, O. R., Chiappe, A., & Fontán de Bedout, L. (2025). AI-powered learning analytics for metacognitive and socioemotional development: a systematic review. Frontiers in Education, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1672901
Pan, Z., Biegley, L., Taylor, A., & Zheng, H. (2024). A Systematic Review of Learning Analytics. Journal of Learning Analytics, 11(2), 52–72. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2023.8093
Paulsen, L., & Lindsay, E. (2024). Learning analytics dashboards are increasingly becoming about learning and not just analytics - A systematic review. Education and Information Technologies, 29(11), 14279–14308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12401-4
Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E., & Williams, R. J. (1986). Learning representations by back-propagating errors. Nature, 323(6088), 533–536. https://doi.org/10.1038/323533a0
Saleem, R., Yuan, B., Kurugollu, F., Anjum, A., & Liu, L. (2022). Explaining deep neural networks: A survey on the global interpretation methods. Neurocomputing, 513, 165–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2022.09.129
Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing Metacognitive Awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19(4), 460–475. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1994.1033
Siqueira, M. A. M., Gonçalves, J. P., Mendonça, V. S., Kobayasi, R., Arantes-Costa, F. M., Tempski, P. Z., & Martins, M. de A. (2020). Relationship between metacognitive awareness and motivation to learn in medical students. BMC Medical Education, 20(1), 393. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02318-8
Wang, S., Wang, F., Zhu, Z., Wang, J., Tran, T., & Du, Z. (2024). Artificial intelligence in education: A systematic literature review. Expert Systems with Applications, 252, 124167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2024.124167
Wangid, M. N., Hastomo, A., & Nurulaeni, F. (2020). Mobile Learning-Based Science Mathematic Story: Attracting Students Studying Interest. https://doi.org/10.2991/ASSEHR.K.200204.027
Williams, C. A., Nordeen, J., Browne, C., & Marshall, B. (2022). Exploring student perceptions of their learning adaptions during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Chiropractic Education, 36(1), 82–93. https://doi.org/10.7899/JCE-21-11
Xu, X., Qiao, L., Cheng, N., Liu, H., & Zhao, W. (2025). Enhancing self‐regulated learning and learning experience in generative AI environments: The critical role of metacognitive support. British Journal of Educational Technology, 56(5), 1842–1863. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13599
Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a Self-Regulated Learner: An Overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Indonesia (JPPI)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
